HOME | ABOUT DR. CHAN | BLOG | STUDY CLUB | CONTINUING EDUCATION | PATIENT EDUCATION | ORTHODONTICS | LABORATORY | NM DENTISTRY | RESEARCH GROUP | SCIENCE | ANNOUNCEMENTS | ACCOMMODATIONS | ARTICLES | CONTACT US | CALENDAR

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Effect of Increased Maxillo-mandibular Relationship on Isometric Strength in TMD Patients with Loss of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion

Tariq Abduljabbar, D.D.S., M.S.; Noshir R. Mehta, D.M.D., M.S.; Albert G., Forgione, Ph.D.; R. Ernest Clark, Ph.D.; Joseph H. Kronman, D.M.D., Ph.D.; Theodore L. Munsat, M.D.; Patrick George, B.S.: Effect of Increased Maxillo-mandibular Relationship on Isometric Strength in TMD Patients with Loss of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion.  THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE JANUARY 1997, VOL. 15, NO. 1, pp. 57-67.

ABSTRACT:
The effect on isometric strength of the shoulders and limbs while biting in habitual occlusion, on a bite-elevating appliance and on a placebo appliance was analyzed. Twenty female volunteer patients, presenting with temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome and obvious loss of vertical dimension, served as subjects. All were weaker to the manual application of the Isometric Deltoid Press (IDP) when biting, as opposed to maintaining the mandible in an unsupported rest position. Two intraoral appliances were fabricated for each subject: a bite-elevating appliance (BEA) set by a functional criterion of peak strength to the IDP and a placebo appliance which did not interfere with occlusion but was “set” with a mock IDP procedure. Testing was carried out by the Neuromuscular Research Testing
Laboratory of the Neurology Department of Tufts New England Medical Center. Testing was independent of the dentist who fabricated and set the appliances. A standard neuromuscular test with the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction apparatus was used to assess strength of right and left shoulder, elbow and knee flexion and extension as is routinely performed with all neuromuscular disease
patients. Twelve strength tests were carried out for each of three conditions: 1. Baseline–biting in habitual occlusion; 2. Elevated–biting on the BEA; and 3. Placebo–biting with the placebo appliance inserted.  The order of conditions 2 and 3 was counterbalanced without knowledge of the subjects. Twelve repeated measures ANOVAs (each subject as their own control) were conducted for each of the 12
strength measures. All F-tests indicated a significant main effect for treatment differences (p<0.0001).  Mean strength biting on the BEA was consistantly greater (p< 0.001) than Baseline or Placebo strength.  Baseline and Placebo condition were equivalent. These findings confirmed previous observations at this TMD Center: individuals with loss of vertical dimension of occlusion respond to a bite raising appliance by increased isometric-strength.